Hello Jim, I have
Hello Jim, >From FullScreen CMS, I do a PF9 to get to the RDRLIST. Pick one and Peek. Did a Q PF PF1 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK PF2 BEFORE SOS LINEADD PF3 ONLY COMMAND QUIT PF4 BEFORE TABKEY PF5 BEFORE SCHANGE 6 PF6 ONLY ? Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-363-5050 ext 35050 -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of James Stracka (DHL US) Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:28 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update Is it just this location or do others have this problem? I issue PEEK to look at a file in the READER. At the bottom of the screen is: 1= Help 2= Add line 3= Quit 4= Tab 5= Clocate 6= ?/Change 7= Backward 8= Forward 9= Receive 10= Rgtleft 11= Spltjoin 12= Cursor I accidentally hit <PF4> instead of <PF3> causing the file to be deleted: File PROFILE EXEC has been discarded Going back into PEEK and doing Q PF it show that <PF4> is set to DISCARD instead of BEFORE TABKEY. PF1 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK PF2 BEFORE SOS LINEADD PF3 ONLY COMMAND QUIT PF4 BEFORE DISCARD PF5 BEFORE SCHANGE 6 PF6 ONLY ? PF7 BEFORE BACKWARD PF8 BEFORE FORWARD PF9 BEFORE MACRO RECEIVE PF10 BEFORE RGTLEFT PF11 BEFORE SPLTJOIN PF12 BEFORE CURSOR HOME PF13 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK PF14 BEFORE SOS LINEADD PF15 ONLY COMMAND QUIT PF16 BEFORE TABKEY PF17 BEFORE SCHANGE 18 PF18 ONLY ? PF19 BEFORE BACKWARD PF20 BEFORE FORWARD PF21 BEFORE MACRO RECEIVE PF22 BEFORE RGTLEFT PF23 BEFORE SPLTJOIN PF24 BEFORE CURSOR HOME Just wondering???? -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Edward M Martin Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:25 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update As is said by Admiral Rickover "It is obvious to the most casual observer" To which we muttered under our breath 'yea, right' Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-363-5050 ext 35050 -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:53 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update On Apr 3, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Raymond Noal wrote: > > I would like to thank all of you who responded. I was really > surprised at how the majority of you made the leap from using PEEK > to TCPIP data buffers. Well, it's highly intuitive, after all. Adam
