That's a modified PROFPEEK XEDIT, or a DEFAULTS command that changed the fname of PEEK's Profile (issue DEFAULTS LIST PEEK to find out).. Seting a PFkey to discard something is bad habit, and then not even update the PF description line is even worse. I really wanting a PFkey to delete something, I'd change that to 'SET PF4 CMSG DISCARD' then you must press the PFkey followed by ENTER to execute it.
2009/4/3 James Stracka (DHL US) <james.stra...@dhl.com>: > Is it just this location or do others have this problem? > > I issue PEEK to look at a file in the READER. > > At the bottom of the screen is: > > 1= Help 2= Add line 3= Quit 4= Tab 5= Clocate 6= > ?/Change > 7= Backward 8= Forward 9= Receive 10= Rgtleft 11= Spltjoin 12= > Cursor > > I accidentally hit <PF4> instead of <PF3> causing the file to be > deleted: > File PROFILE EXEC has been discarded > > Going back into PEEK and doing Q PF it show that <PF4> is set to DISCARD > instead of BEFORE TABKEY. > > PF1 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK > PF2 BEFORE SOS LINEADD > PF3 ONLY COMMAND QUIT > PF4 BEFORE DISCARD > PF5 BEFORE SCHANGE 6 > PF6 ONLY ? > PF7 BEFORE BACKWARD > PF8 BEFORE FORWARD > PF9 BEFORE MACRO RECEIVE > PF10 BEFORE RGTLEFT > PF11 BEFORE SPLTJOIN > PF12 BEFORE CURSOR HOME > PF13 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK > PF14 BEFORE SOS LINEADD > PF15 ONLY COMMAND QUIT > PF16 BEFORE TABKEY > PF17 BEFORE SCHANGE 18 > PF18 ONLY ? > PF19 BEFORE BACKWARD > PF20 BEFORE FORWARD > PF21 BEFORE MACRO RECEIVE > PF22 BEFORE RGTLEFT > PF23 BEFORE SPLTJOIN > PF24 BEFORE CURSOR HOME > > > Just wondering???? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Edward M Martin > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:25 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update > > As is said by Admiral Rickover > "It is obvious to the most casual observer" > > To which we muttered under our breath 'yea, right' > > Ed Martin > Aultman Health Foundation > 330-363-5050 > ext 35050 > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Adam Thornton > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:53 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update > > On Apr 3, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Raymond Noal wrote: > >> >> I would like to thank all of you who responded. I was really >> surprised at how the majority of you made the leap from using PEEK >> to TCPIP data buffers. > > Well, it's highly intuitive, after all. > > Adam > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
