Right-on, Perry. Should I say "as usual"? If the intended secondary user is disconnected, the SET SECUSER command fails if that condition is not met.
Does the machine that issues the commands have Class C privileges? If so, the SEND works because of that without needing SECUSER, but the result is not what you like to see, as you have demonstrated. Regards, Richard Schuh ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Perry Ruiter Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 2:05 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SECUSER and SEND problem Having just spent the past several months of my life deeply immersed in all thing SCIF, I can say Kris is right. When a guest issues a read, CP checks if the guest's secondary is functional. If it is not, a CP READ is also made pending. To be functional the secondary must be connected or, if disconnected, must have an IUCV connection to *MSG or *MSGALL ... Perry Perry Ruiter 250-658-6517
