VM, PR/SM. What's the difference? ;-) Actually, the question was meant to be facetious.
Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Ackerman > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:58 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting > > That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that > there is no z/V= M in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS > does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does no= t > handshake with z/VM as far as I know. Have I missed something? > > Alan Ackerman > Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of America (dot) com > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:55:11 -0700, Schuh, Richard > <rsc...@visa.com> wrot= > e: > > >Does this mean that z/OS is finally catching up to the VM/DOS > >handshakin= > g of years gone by? > > > >Regards, > >Richard Schuh > > > > > > > >> z/OS has a new feature HiperDispatch to help reduce the MP > and NUMA > >> effec= t. In the Austin SHARE proceedings, see "2831 > >> - System z10: HiperDispatch From a Sysprog= Perspective." It > >> involves cooperation between PR/SM and the z/OS dispatcher. > >> > >> Alan Ackerman > >> alan.acker...@bankofamerica.com > >> > ========================== > ========================== > ========== > ============ >
