> How the library manager is controlled depends entirely upon the > manufacturer. When we had an IBM ATL, we indeed used RMSMASTER.
Ah, right. I keep forgetting about the STK stuff -- I guess the therapy finally took 8-). In any case, the point still stands that the tape managers call "something else" to control the library automation. Maybe you should add NJE to your Linux systems? If we could agree on a command protocol, you might end up defining how to get channel-attached tape usable in Linux. -- db
