Yes indeed, but you can replace OPERATOR by any other user that has the right RSCS privs. I hoped that was obvious.
2010/8/16 Schuh, Richard <rsc...@visa.com> > Doesn't "SEND CP OPERATOR ..." or "FOR OPERATOR ..." constitute "having > the operator" do it? Neither of those is an acceptable solution, at least > not here. > > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Kris Buelens > *Sent:* Friday, August 13, 2010 1:32 PM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: RSCS Messages > > What about > CP SEND RSCS RSCS START xxx > Then it is RSCS itself that starts the link, > Or to complete what Mike mentions (and what I regularly used, not only for > RSCS) > CP FOR OPERATOR CMD SMSG RSCS START xxx > or, a bit old fashioned > CP SEND CP OPERATOR SMSG RSCS START xxx > for RSCS the 2 commands above come from OPERATOR, not your userid. > > 2010/8/12 Michael Harding <mhard...@us.ibm.com> > >> The CP "for" command may be your friend here; after all, SMSG IS a CP >> command... >> -- >> Mike Harding >> z/VM System Support >> >> >> >> The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> wrote on >> 08/12/2010 01:18:40 PM: >> >> > From: "Schuh, Richard" <rsc...@visa.com> >> >> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >> > Date: 08/12/2010 01:19 PM >> > Subject: Re: RSCS Messages >> > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> >> >> > >> > Having the operator do anything other than a simple START, including >> > "PARM anything" requires an approval process. That said, a scan of >> > the config file reveals that an id that rarely logs on is >> > authorized. I will use it as my surrogate. Thanks for the idea. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Richard Schuh >> > >> > > > > -- > Kris Buelens, > IBM Belgium, VM customer support > > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
