On Thursday, 12/02/2010 at 08:15 EST, Mark Wheeler 
<mwheele...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It would be nice if UFT(D) would support it.

RFC 1440 does not define a mechanism for the UFT client and server to 
negotiate and initiate TLS.  A new RFC is needed.  (Note that the IETF now 
requires protocols to be able to negotiate TLS on the same port as the 
unsecured version.)

Further, UFT(D) in VM is not written to the VMCF/Pascal interface and so 
couldn't support it until CMS supports dynamic TLS for IUCV sockets.

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to