On 12/16/22 5:42 PM, Evan Burke wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 3:29 PM Grant Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps it's my ignorance, but I don't see us approaching, much less
getting better than 99.9% accuracy. And let's be honest, in any
other
field, 99.9% accuracy is really good accuracy.
To clarify: my point was not "99% is not good enough". My point was -
99% effective ESP defenses in normal scenarios end up completely
ineffective for replay scenarios, IF you measure based on volumes of
spam sent. When a single message turns into 100 million replays,
attackers can justify spending a lot of time and effort to get that 1
message out.
At this point, I have to ask what you think this wg can do about it. All
of the solutions I can think about are completely out of scope of IETF.
If you're trying to get amplification to make receivers do something
you're probably going to be disappointed because IETF is very
experienced at pushing on string to no effect.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
