On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:57 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Thu 05/Jan/2023 22:26:32 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
> > On 1/5/2023 9:20 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> >> How about "replay-resistant protocol"?
> >
> > btw, it isn't clear that 'protocol' is what a solution will be. might
> be.
> > might not. might be purely operational conventions, for example.
>
> That's right. "Replay-resistant solution"?
>
The current charter text says "replay-resistant mechanisms", which avoids
constraining us only to protocol solutions.
I'm not seeing any other proposed changes to the charter; the milestones
are negotiable in flight so they don't need to be perfect out of the
starting gate, but suggestions there are welcome.
Absent any other proposed changes to the charter's text, I'll release this
for the next phase of review ("External Review", i.e., the whole IETF) in
the next few days.
-MSK, ART AD
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
