On 1/5/23 9:20 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Thu 05/Jan/2023 17:33:36 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I've added a few proposed milestones with dates
I wouldn't call "replay-resistant DKIM enhancement(s)" the
deliverable. I understand the WG name is DKIM, but two of the
proposed drafts don't even mention it. We may call ARC a "kind of
DKIM", but a solution based on it would be better called an ARC
enhancement, no?
How about "replay-resistant protocol"?
Sorry, ARC is a failed experiment that doesn't deliver what it was
supposed to deliver. The DKIM wg should have no part of it. It should be
completely out of scope.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
