On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 11:19 AM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> > It's certainly possible to collect data that might correlate something > like "Subject signed vs. not signed" with a spam score, and that could feed > in to a best practices document. I don't know who might be up for > investing the time into such a survey, however. OpenDKIM used to collect > such summaries from volunteer participants; I can see if the data sitting > around in those tables had enough information for such a survey, but it > almost certainly won't be current data. > > What I'm starting to think is that if we can collect that into the problem > statement that may well be all we need to do if we determine that there is > no there there in the solution space (given the solutions on offer now, > that seems to be the case). Also: we can't write a BCP if we can't know > what they may be because of the proprietary nature of the > filtering/reputation. If the clues we find are well known to them then, > well, it's sort of like what are we supposed to do? > I'm doubtful, but I'll see if the data I still have can reveal this sort of correlation given the participants I had and the data they submitted. If there are any large operators that could run such a survey, I'm sure the WG would appreciate it. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
