On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:53:19 PM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: ... > (2) Throughout the document, the proper term "Replay Attack" (and sometimes > "Replay") is used, but it's never directly defined. I don't think you need > it to be formal, but if you really want to do it that way, please add a > definition for it. ...
I think a definition that describes a condition that's technically distinguishable from normal DKIM operations is essential if we are going to make any progress. "I know it when I see it" may work for the US Supreme Court, but it's not adequate here. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
