On Monday, August 7, 2023 7:47:47 PM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 3:58 PM Scott Kitterman <ietf-d...@kitterman.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:53:19 PM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> > > (2) Throughout the document, the proper term "Replay Attack" (and
> > 
> > sometimes
> > 
> > > "Replay") is used, but it's never directly defined.  I don't think you
> > 
> > need
> > 
> > > it to be formal, but if you really want to do it that way, please add a
> > > definition for it.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > I think a definition that describes a condition that's technically
> > distinguishable from normal DKIM operations is essential if we are going
> > to
> > make any progress.  "I know it when I see it" may work for the US Supreme
> > Court, but it's not adequate here.
> 
> I think the document does describe the attack.  An instance of the attack
> is when a replayed message lands someplace it wasn't originally intended to
> land, assuming normal usage.
> 
> The document also describes that the payload itself in normal usage is
> indistinguishable from an instance of the attack; the obvious implication
> is that there's no solution based solely on the payload format.
> 
> Your point that we possibly can't go much further than that is one for the
> WG to deliberate, to be sure.  And I suggest that that's one possible
> outcome of this WG.
> 
> But my point above is simpler: "Replay Attack", when capitalized that way,
> has me going to look for a formal definition of that term someplace.  That
> is, if we're going to use it that way, we should define it that way.  So,
> just add it to the Glossary at least, or say in Section 1.1 that this term,
> in this document, means the attack described by that section.  Or something.

I see your point.  Thanks,

It will be interesting to see what develops.  It's not a mystery that I'm 
skeptical of a protocol solution to the issue.

Scott k


_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

Reply via email to