Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20230810150536.5k9uk%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
much too much was written it seems. ... |A nice property would be that all (possible forms of) needed |sub-signatures could be generated in parallel, a task that (most Except for the one which requires the "domainkey-encrypt" of the recipient domain, of course. But this would be a top candidate for caching, and already the second message send to its domain could avoid creating any subsignature but that |[1] + if DNS per-domain (eg) "domainkey-encrypt" is found | . create DKIM subsignature for domain, include all | rcpt-to:<> that reside on that domain within it, | encrypted with "domainkey-encrypt". ... |Thank you. Yes. Greetings from Germany. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
