> On 30 Aug 2023, at 09:21, Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > On Wed 30/Aug/2023 06:20:47 +0200 Steve Atkins wrote: >>> On 30 Aug 2023, at 03:38, Grant Taylor >>> <gtaylor=40tnetconsulting....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> On 8/29/23 3:15 PM, Steve Atkins wrote: >>>> Any attempt by senders to filter outbound emails based solely on content >>>> is going to have a lot of false negatives and positives, wherever you >>>> decide to draw the line. >>> I find the idea of using different, probably less stringent, filtering on >>> outbound than on inbound to be hypocritical. >> You have much more data for inbound email, and access to a much wider range >> of reactions. That’s not “hypocritical”. >> The only information a sender has that a receiver doesn’t is a broader view >> of who the recipients of messages being sent are - and that’s exactly the >> information that DKIM replay hides from the sender. > > > Large sites should exchange reputation information on each other's accounts. > Murray already proposed a standard for doing so.
That doesn’t seem like something that would have any effect on someone sending a single message to themselves, which is the perspective a sender is likely to have of a DKIM replay. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
