It appears that Steve Atkins <st...@wordtothewise.com> said: >> Do people really think that senders that are ignoring Sec. 8.2 of RFC 6376 >> are going to pay attention to a separate RFC >that updates that RFC? > >+1. Senders, no.
Honestly, I don't know. Of the trickle of mail I see with l=, most is from the libertarian Reason blog with l=1 and the rest is from Verisign who for some reason sign with l= actual length. I suspect I could get Verisign's attention. Reason, who knows, as likely as not they have some political reason they think it's a good idea. >But there are already major mail receivers who treat any DKIM signature >containing l= to be invalid. That will definitely get their attention. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
