Frank Ellermann wrote: > > I see no #1534 in the nine IETF 71 PDF pages, and > no 1534 in the jabber log. #1543 was discussed. >
As I noted in http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009713.html , issue #1534 fell through the cracks when I was preparing my slides for Philadelphia and was not discussed. I had suggested that it not be closed without the opportunity for some discussion. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html