> Let's not be too gentle here; failure to do this results in a very > misleading result from ADSP. I would make it at least a SHOULD.
So, I want to understand. You are proposing that we NOT eradicate all mention of an NXDOMAIN check but that we move it from a required algorithmic step and into language which is non-compulsory. Is this correct? Arvel _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
