Sorry, I'm asking John Levine this question (not Jim). Arvel Hathcock wrote: >> Let's not be too gentle here; failure to do this results in a very >> misleading result from ADSP. I would make it at least a SHOULD. > > So, I want to understand. > > You are proposing that we NOT eradicate all mention of an NXDOMAIN check > but that we move it from a required algorithmic step and into language > which is non-compulsory. Is this correct? > > Arvel > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
