>> Let's not be too gentle here; failure to do this results in a very >> misleading result from ADSP. I would make it at least a SHOULD. > > So, I want to understand. > > You are proposing that we NOT eradicate all mention of an NXDOMAIN check but > that we move it from a required algorithmic step and into language which is > non-compulsory. Is this correct?
Yeah. It's a good idea, but it's not part of DKIM. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
