-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > My theory is that DKIM only applies to valid 2822 messages, and it's > not a substitute for a sanity check for all the screwy things one > can send in a non-conformant message. Perhaps it would be a good > idea someday to > collect experience and advice into an implmentation guide, but other > than that, it's not our problem. Agreed?
Completely. Broken messages should be handled at a different layer. Jon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3 Charset: US-ASCII wj8DBQFIW96ZsTedWZOD3gYRAiYrAJ40vRhsGsRk1ShSlQl+brlNBwi6tACg25pa /XBh0wWusDLw3NkYHlbqueY= =VSEi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html