On 26/06/2008 10:53, "Dave Crocker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the idea that anyone would think that a signing mechanism designed to > operate on RFC 2822 messages would somehow be expected to operate successfully > on non-conformant messages really bothers me. And yet, those questions keep coming up -- even from people we'd expect to understand what a correctly formed RFC 2822 message looks like. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Work with me! http://www.returnpath.net/careers/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
