I'm ok with this... Addresses the majority of confusion that's even popped up in the last week or so.
-Dennis On Jan 26, 2009, at January 26,1:24 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > Folks, > > Howdy. > > I've just submitted an Internet Draft with text for the working > group to > consider. A group of us have been working on it. > > It clarifies and resolves the roles and relationship of the d= and > i= tag. > > An html version of the I-D is at: > > <http://dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-00.html> > > d/ > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html