On 3/26/2009 11:41, Hector Santos wrote: > The question is whether DKIM is to replace any IP technology, > specifically SPF.
... > Anyway, the point is MOST SMTP vendors are in the business of provide > CHOICE not LIMITING it. As an email systems administrator, I view DKIM as a potential addition to my toolbox, not as a replacement for any/all of the tools already in my toolbox. I see SPF and DKIM as complementary, not competing, technologies. A site might perform both SPF checks and DKIM signature verification, and configure their systems to allow a verified DKIM signature to override a failed SPF check when determining the disposition of an inbound message. -- Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator OIT Messaging Services Team University of Notre Dame pruss...@nd.edu _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
