All of those clarifications were also filed as errata. All of the ones
that were ratified by the working group should be incorporated as part
of a 4871+5672bis. In other words, yes, that's definitely one of the
tasks that should be part of moving the document forward.
Tony Hansen
t...@att.com
John Levine wrote:
> It occurs to me that there are a bunch of technical clarifications to
> the spec that (I think) Tony wrote up after the connectathon a year or
> so ago. If we want to move to DS, would it be worth a pass over 4871
> to incorporate them? I don't think there have been any more recently,
> so this would probably count as making it more mature.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
