On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ian Eiloart <i...@sussex.ac.uk> wrote: > > > --On 30 April 2010 01:06:15 +0000 John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: > >> I just don't see how you can simultaneously say "throw away unsigned >> mail" and "don't throw away unsigned mail if a list says it used to be >> signed" unless you have some way to identify trustworthy lists. But >> once you know that a list is trustworthy, why wouldn't you just accept >> all its mail? I just don't see a plausible scenario where you you >> know you trust the list but still want to accept or reject mail based >> on assertions the list itself makes. >> > > How about you trust the list, and it says the inbound message wasn't > signed? The list has left the value judgement to the recipient.
How does one do that if using an email web service provider that puts the message into the spam folder without giving the recipient a choice? -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
