On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:36 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > So, is this a discussion about a BCP for MLMs or is this a discussion > about revisiting the ADSP spec? The course of the discussion really > depends on what the consensus is.
Let's break these up. Murray tried and I think succeeded to some degree of getting a clear thread that is dedicated only to the MLM BCP. What makes that a refreshingly productive thread is that we have an I-D to review and comment on. Perhaps we are at (or long past) the point of diminishing returns in debating the efficacy of ADSP until we have an I-D that covers fixing/enhancing ADSP to make it more useful. -- Brett _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
