On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:21 PM, J.D. Falk <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org>wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > > > Rumor has is that some large players (such as Yahoo!) are > > disregarding such ephemeral property of a selector and > > are trying to associate a reputation scheme based on both > > the domain *and* the selector. > > That rumour is based on a presentation I gave in 2006 or so, while working > at Yahoo!. Within hours, Dave Crocker had convinced me that tying > reputation to the selector was a bad idea. > > Please help me quash the rumour, there's enough baseless FUD already. > http://feedbackloop.yahoo.net/ Step 2 doesn't help. (yes, you can put * for all selectors, but asking for one when it isn't really needed leads to FUD). -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
