On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jeff Macdonald <macfisher...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:21 PM, J.D. Falk > <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org>wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: >> >> > Rumor has is that some large players (such as Yahoo!) are >> > disregarding such ephemeral property of a selector and >> > are trying to associate a reputation scheme based on both >> > the domain *and* the selector. >> >> That rumour is based on a presentation I gave in 2006 or so, while working >> at Yahoo!. Within hours, Dave Crocker had convinced me that tying >> reputation to the selector was a bad idea. >> >> Please help me quash the rumour, there's enough baseless FUD already. >> > > http://feedbackloop.yahoo.net/ > > Step 2 doesn't help. (yes, you can put * for all selectors, but asking for > one when it isn't really needed leads to FUD). > > > Yeah, I've always thought this process was a bit odd. I began to question if it even mattered to them and, furthermore, how much weight they were actually putting on Domain vs. IP for reputation. Alex Soto a...@thesotos.org
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
