> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:d...@dcrocker.net] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:30 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01 > > As a part of the IETF implementation report for Draft Standard, I > suspect it is > distracting or possibly worse, since it implies that that bit of data > is relevant to the protocol and its deployment.
I agree that's true. But on the flipside, this particular statistic pointed out that the slight text change you proposed in your previous message might be a good idea for the DS version. It might therefore actually be useful to include as justification for such an edit should anyone ask. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
