> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:01 AM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing > > > We want to re-submit DKIM Signing to Proposed Standard, in order to fix an > > edge condition that is only a theoretical issue and only fixes a problem > > that is actually outside of the scope of what DKIM is trying to achieve? > > Detecting modification in transit is outside the scope of what DKIM is > trying to achieve?
Doesn't DKIM try to detect modification of the portion covered by the hashes, which is unchanged in this scenario? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
