> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:30 AM > To: DKIM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing > > And if we are not going to fix ADSP (yet), then the only way we can stop > that particular exploit is to fix DKIM. > > Arguing that "ADSP is a completely separate discussion" will achieve > nothing.
If that's consensus, then we're on the slippery slope of "fixing" DKIM to deal with flaws at all layers above it. And we'll never be done. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html