> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] 
> On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:30 AM
> To: DKIM
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing
> 
> And if we are not going to fix ADSP (yet), then the only way we can stop
> that particular exploit is to fix DKIM.
> 
> Arguing that "ADSP is a completely separate discussion" will achieve
> nothing.

If that's consensus, then we're on the slippery slope of "fixing" DKIM to deal 
with flaws at all layers above it.  And we'll never be done.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to