On 10/11/2010 11:46 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > Dave: > There's an error in the new paragraph in section 5.3; the first > sentence appears to have been fragmented. It reads thus: "Similarly, > a message that is not compliant with RFC5322, RFC2045 correct or > interpret such content." > Please post the correct version here, so reviewers have it handy, and > have it ready for any subsequent update.
Oh boy. Very sorry folks. The full text reads: > <t>Similarly, a message not compliant with RFC5322, RFC2045 and > RFC2047, can be subject to attempts by intermediaries to > correct > or interpret such content. See the Section 8 of [SUBMISSION] > for > examples of changes that are commonly made. Such "corrections" > may break DKIM signatures or have other undesirable effects. > Therefore, a DKIM agent SHOULD confirm that a message is > compliant with those specifications prior to processing. </t> d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
