On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:36:42 +0100, Hector Santos <hsan...@isdg.net> wrote:
> What it means for most systems that they need to change a model based
> on this:
>
> CHECK DKIM ---- PASS --> ACCEPT
> CHECK RFC5322 ---- BAD --> REJECT
> BREAK
> RESIGN
> DISTRIBUTE
>
> To this:
>
> CHECK RFC5322 ---- BAD --> REJECT
> CHECK DKIM ---- PASS --> ACCEPT
> BREAK
> RESIGN
> DISTRIBUTE
>
But full 100% RFC5322 checking is extremely tedious, and is more that we
actually need.
What we want is more like
CHECK DKIM && CHECK RFC5322 headers included in h= tag --> ACCEPT
where at least the CHECK RFC5322 counts the number of occurrences, perhaps
a little more, but not worry about the more obscure checks such as LFCR
instead of CRLF.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: ...@clerew.man.ac.uk snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
