Messages by Date
-
2010/11/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Scott Kitterman
-
2010/11/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/11/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Steve Atkins
-
2010/11/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Tsuneki Ohnishi
-
2010/11/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Tsuneki Ohnishi
-
2010/11/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Byung-Hee HWANG
-
2010/11/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Mark Delany
-
2010/11/19
[ietf-dkim] DKIM Japan has been set up
Tsuneki Ohnishi
-
2010/11/15
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/12
Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00
John Levine
-
2010/11/12
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/11/11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/11
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/11/09
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
John R. Levine
-
2010/11/09
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Todd Lyons
-
2010/11/09
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-05.txt
Internet-Drafts
-
2010/11/09
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
John R. Levine
-
2010/11/08
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04.txt
Internet-Drafts
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
J.D. Falk
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Scott Kitterman
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Bill.Oxley
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/08
Re: [ietf-dkim] Necessary Verifier Actions to mitigate exploitation of trust established through DKIM signatures.
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/11/08
[ietf-dkim] Getting resolution on the "double header" issue
Barry Leiba
-
2010/11/07
Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/07
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04.txt
Internet-Drafts
-
2010/11/07
[ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-00
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/07
[ietf-dkim] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-04
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/05
Re: [ietf-dkim] Necessary Verifier Actions to mitigate exploitation of trust established through DKIM signatures.
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/05
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack, why RFC 5322 compliance is a fuzzy term, and what about malformed MIME structures?)
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack, why RFC 5322 compliance is a fuzzy term, and what about malformed MIME structures?)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/04
Re: [ietf-dkim] The Total Solution is an Integrated One.
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack, why RFC 5322 compliance is a fuzzy term, and what about malformed MIME structures?)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/03
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/03
[ietf-dkim] The Total Solution is an Integrated One.
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/03
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.)
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/03
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.)
John R. Levine
-
2010/11/03
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/03
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/11/02
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues (why multiple h= singleton listing is an ineffective hack.)
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/02
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/11/02
[ietf-dkim] Absolving Domain Responsibility
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
John R. Levine
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Rolf E. Sonneveld
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Douglas Otis
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Hector Santos
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/11/01
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/31
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Graham Murray
-
2010/10/30
Re: [ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/30
[ietf-dkim] Some responsibility
Rolf E. Sonneveld
-
2010/10/30
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/30
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/29
Re: [ietf-dkim] running code, wildcard dep't
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/28
[ietf-dkim] running code, wildcard dep't
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/28
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/28
[ietf-dkim] double headers, running code dep't
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/27
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/27
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/27
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/26
[ietf-dkim] Take Three - Section 8.14
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/26
Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Conspicuously absent statistics
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
[ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Michael Thomas
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
[ietf-dkim] Conspicuously absent statistics
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
Eliot Lear
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
John Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
John Levine
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Rolf E. Sonneveld
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Rolf E. Sonneveld
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/25
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Mark Delany
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/24
[ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
John Levine
-
2010/10/24
[ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/23
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Barry Leiba
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
SM
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02
SM
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02
Scott Kitterman
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises
John Levine
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02
John Levine
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Mark Delany
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
SM
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/22
[ietf-dkim] Multiple occurrences of header fields
Bill.Oxley
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/10/22
[ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis
Barry Leiba
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNA
Barry Leiba
-
2010/10/22
Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNA
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/21
[ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
SM
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
[ietf-dkim] FIX THE (DOC) PROBLEM!
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail
Dave CROCKER
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
J.D. Falk
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations
J.D. Falk
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/21
[ietf-dkim] More on layer violations
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt
J.D. Falk
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
Alessandro Vesely
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing
Charles Lindsey
-
2010/10/21
Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing
Ian Eiloart
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Mark Delany
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Scott Kitterman
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Michael Thomas
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Steve Atkins
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Douglas Otis
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Michael Thomas
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Rolf E. Sonneveld
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?
John R. Levine
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Hector Santos
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
-
2010/10/20
Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check
Murray S. Kucherawy