> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Hector Santos > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:17 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Cc: Barry Leiba > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition > > > So I strongly object on procedural grounds for authors who kill file > > people in general, and for those asking for consensus in particular. > > In fact, I have been looking at RFC 2026 Section 6.5.1 (a) as an > reason to appeal based on the principal key editors are knowingly > filtering input from WG participants. I know both Dave and Murray are > doing this and both are key editors of this document. This creates > problems and also unnecessarily increasing the volume of input from > people who don't believe they are being heard.
I was threatened with legal action on the basis of tortious interference if I continued to disagree with one participant's technical arguments or professional conduct on this list. I have thus elected not to engage that person any further in any discourse whatsoever on the list absent a withdrawal of that threat and some kind of guarantee of future civility. I have serious doubts the IESG would find fault in that choice on appeal. The IETF has dealt severely with other participants that have taken that attitude in the past. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
