> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:48 AM > To: Hector Santos > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats > > > -- 25.9% : dkim_body_hash_mismatch > > I was going to ask... > > > I should probably add a recording which of these has List-IDs, but I > > think the high body hash failures are most list systems. > > ...but you answered.
We do have that recorded. Of 10,561 signatures for which the body hash failed, 8,219 (77.8%) appeared to be list traffic (i.e. had a "List-*" header field or a "Precedence: list" field). Breaking that down further: Of the 8,219, 6,614 (80.4%) were author domain signatures, so the rest were presumably list signatures (or something else). 57 of them failed even in the presence of an "l=" tag. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
