So it establishes a false sense of resolving a security issue.
Hmmn. I could reiterate for a fourth time why the double header thing is only a security issue in the context of DKIM, but there's clearly something else going on that prevents people from getting it.
Here's a question: in the absence of DKIM, does anyone think that doubled headers present a security problem? If so, what is the problem, and how has it been addressed in the past?
R's, JohnPS: For the moment, please treat "smells like spam" as not a security problem. If it's a spam sign, does any spam filter currently look for it?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
