On 10/20/10 9:30 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy >> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:55 PM >> To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check >> > <SNIP> > >> There has been talk of applying DKIM to technologies like Usenet and > HTTP >> output. Packing DKIM with mail-specific verification requirements > could >> prevent such things from happening. Shall we also add a "but only > when >> used in the email context" clause? >> > > Seeing as the M in DKIM stands for Mail, we don't have to put a "but > only when used in the email context" clause. If a DKIM like approach is > used for other protocols then we might reasonably text specific to those > protocols - DKIH (Domain Keys Identified HTML as an example).
Yep. Or other protocols will use parts of DKIM. Like with MIME (Multipurpose Internet /Mail/ Extensions); it has been used by other protocols as well. /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
