On 11/24/10 11:38 AM, Mark Delany wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0800, Douglas Otis allegedly wrote: >> On 11/24/10 9:01 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >>> On 11/23/2010 3:14 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: >>>> Actually, they're complementary. In places where DKIM fails >>>> (mailing lists rewriting messages), SPF can succeed. And in places >>>> where SPF fails (message forwarding), DKIM can succeed. >>> This assertion of facts is almost certainly incorrect. >>> >>> Please specify the details of the scenarios in which you claim these >>> assertions are correct. >> +1 > -10 Please don't. It's out of scope for this group. +100 (see your magnitude and raise you one) :^)
Perhaps the best place to continue the discussion is on the asrg list. It would be nice if there were a 5321-ietf mailing list. -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
