On 24/Nov/10 16:46, Ian Eiloart wrote: > DKIM and SPF both permit the use of domain based reputation > databases. Unfortunately, both have problems with various paths > that emails may take. Fortunately, the problematic paths are > different - mailing lists are problematic for one, and forwarding > is problematic for the other. > > My point that DKIM and SPF can complement one another therefore relies on > an understanding that mailing lists are not forwarders.
+1. For different reasons, both ADSP and SPF seem to need a revision. Is there an opportunity to be taken here? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
