Let's not do this on this list.
On 24/11/10 15:42, John R. Levine wrote: > This really does need to be a FAQ. > >>> DKIM works just dandy, when lists sign their mail like this one does. > >> Unless the intermediary co-operates by re-signing, mailing lists can break >> DKIM signatures. > > Quite true. But broken signatures are only a problem in a mutant version > of DKIM unlike the one specified in RFC 4871, so it's not a problem. > >> but you do lose the ability to assign signer domain based reputation >> to the message. > > Unless, of course, the list signs like this one does. I don't see any > reason to think it's less likely that lists sign than that list > contributors sign. Do you? Concrete numbers would help here. > > Anecdotes: all the Yahoogroups lists sign. All of my lists sign. > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
