On 4/13/2011 10:31 AM, J.D. Falk wrote: > I'm generally in favor of updating the document to match the current state of > IDN and EAI work, but I don't know it well enough to comment intelligently on > whether John's proposed text does so.
as phrased, I'll disagree with this. one spec should not try to track fluid developments of other specs. it should cite stable specs, and preferably ones that have gained adoption. anything more than that is attempting to predict the future. in the case of internationalized character issues, that's proved problematic for at least 20 years... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
