> Is there anything that actually needs to be done with a UTF-8 header that > is not covered already in our DKIm spec.?
No, it's fine, so long as we make my proposed changes that clarify that the bits of domain names in the DKIM-Signature: header (d= i= s=) are represented as A-labels. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
