On 04/20/2011 01:29 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > There has been no uptake at all in OpenDKIM for ATPS, and almost none is > apparent with ADSP, although in the latter case our data can only give a > range for adoption because we don't query when an author signature passes. >
That isn't a helpful metric. The 99% most likely domains to have a ADSP record are ones where you see DKIM signatures and they pass. So if you're only checking domains without DKIM signatures (broken or otherwise), you're going to get a self fulfilling prophecy. A much better test would be compile a list of DKIM signing domains, and do the ADSP query on them. Mike, not that i think it's going to be terribly high either _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html