On 04/20/2011 04:13 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> That isn't a helpful metric. The 99% most likely domains to >> have a ADSP record are ones where you see DKIM signatures >> and they pass. So if you're only checking domains without >> DKIM signatures (broken or otherwise), you're going to get >> a self fulfilling prophecy. >> >> A much better test would be compile a list of DKIM signing >> domains, and do the ADSP query on them. >> > Yeah, that's what I meant when I referred to doing five figures worth of TXT > queries. >
I think it would be worth it, since the numbers are almost certainly going to be better, even if they're not great. There's nothing worse than a stat-as-meme that originate from highly flawed studies. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
