> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:43 PM > Cc: DKIM IETF WG > Subject: [ietf-dkim] despair > > There sure seems to be an awful lot of changes going on for a > supposed draft standard document. I for one can't keep up with > the rate of change, and I doubt anybody else can either. I really > don't care if each individual piece can -- microscopically -- be > justified within the process of draft standard: I have no way > to determine whether these changes as a whole constitute a > compatible protocol with 4871 or not.
Barry has asked me to prepare a "diff" of sorts that compares RFC4871 with RFC4871bis so that we can all see the distillation of the proposed changes. I'll be doing that in the next day or so. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
