On 04/26/2011 04:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 2:43 PM >> Cc: DKIM IETF WG >> Subject: [ietf-dkim] despair >> >> There sure seems to be an awful lot of changes going on for a >> supposed draft standard document. I for one can't keep up with >> the rate of change, and I doubt anybody else can either. I really >> don't care if each individual piece can -- microscopically -- be >> justified within the process of draft standard: I have no way >> to determine whether these changes as a whole constitute a >> compatible protocol with 4871 or not. >> > Barry has asked me to prepare a "diff" of sorts that compares RFC4871 with > RFC4871bis so that we can all see the distillation of the proposed changes. > I'll be doing that in the next day or so. > When you commit a 20 page diff without the benefit of a debugging pass and dev test, how much confidence do you have in that commit?
At this point, we have no reason to believe that a new implementation from this draft would interoperate with existing implementations. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
