On 04/27/2011 09:53 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > With that sort of documented history, the responsibility to claim otherwise > falls on the critic. Otherwise the wg is essentially being asked to prove a > negative and almost serves as a DOS attack... >
Denial of service on what/whom? As far as I can see, the only thing that this effort is serving is the process itself. It certainly isn't helping DKIM. > Complaining is easy. Trying to put the work on others is easy. Doing > foundational work to support a claim is not. > This is rich coming from somebody who's never written a DKIM stack to somebody who wrote the first. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
