On 4/28/2011 3:55 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > And we're not. To use your analogy: DKIM returns a status and "d="; extended > DKIM (whatever that means) can return that and more. We're updating the > specification of DKIM here, not declaring what extended DKIM might be. > > It works just fine.
Just to check: I'm not seeing any new material in these new exchanges. So it doesn't look like it needs further discussion? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
